Legal Brief- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Andy’s Sportswear, Inc

  

Legal Brief- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Andy’s Sportswear,
Inc., 1996
Legal Brief Template
Case Info
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Case No.
PARTIES: (Plaintiffs)
DEFENDANTS:
STATEMENT OF ISSUES:
ARGUMENTS OF THE PLAINTIFFS:
ARGUMENTS OF THE DEFENSE:
HOLDING OF THE COURT:
RATIONALE:
Case:
ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC., a Missouri corporation, Plaintiff, vs.
ANDY’S SPORTSWEAR, INC., a California Corporation, Defendant.
DISPOSITION:  [*1]
Plaintiff’s request for a Temporary Restraining Order GRANTED.
CASE SUMMARY:
PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Plaintiff sought a temporary restraining
order under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act, 15 U.S.C.S. § 1125(c), to
prevent defendant from distributing T-shirts that allegedly diluted plaintiff’s
famous mark.
OVERVIEW: Plaintiff brewing company sought a temporary
restraining order under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act, 15 U.S.C.S. §
1125(c), to prevent defendant, a sportswear manufacturer, from distributing
T-shirts that allegedly harmed plaintiff’s famous mark. The court recognized,
and defendant apparently conceded, that plaintiff’s mark was unquestionably
famous. The court also concluded that plaintiff raised serious questions about
the harmful effect of defendant’s T-shirts on plaintiff’s mark, and the court
determined that the balance of hardships tipped in plaintiff’s favor. The court
therefore, pending the preliminary injunction hearing, enjoined defendants from
distributing their T-shirts that purportedly diluted plaintiff’s mark, and also
ordered defendants to recall T-shirts or related products that had already been
distributed.
OUTCOME: Temporary restraining order granted because
plaintiff’s mark was found to be unquestionably famous, plaintiff raised
serious issues regarding dilution of its mark by defendant’s T-shirts, and
balance of hardships tipped in plaintiff’s favor.
CORE TERMS: t-shirts, trademark, preliminary injunction,
dilution, famous, registered trademarks, trade dress, manufacturing,
distributing, unauthorized, designations, putative, artwork, slogans, labels,
logos
JUDGES: THELTON E. HENDERSON, CHIEF JUDGE, UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT
OPINION BY: THELTON E. HENDERSON
OPINION
ORDER
This matter came on for hearing on August 26, 1996, on
plaintiff’s application for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”).
Plaintiff Anheuser-Busch, Inc., asks the Court to (1) enjoin Defendant Andy’s
Sportswear, Inc. (“Andy’s”) from manufacturing and distributing its
“Buttwiser” t-shirts and (2) order Andy’s to recall those t-shirts
currently being offered for sale. Having carefully considered the oral and
written arguments of the parties, and the record in this case, the Court hereby
GRANTS plaintiff’s request, for the reasons discussed below.
Plaintiff bases its motion on several federal and state
trademark causes of action. For the purposes of the instant TRO, however, the
Court only addresses plaintiff’s claim under the recently enacted Federal
Trademark Dilution [*2] Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c). [HN1] Under the Act, an
injunction may issue if (1) the mark is famous; and (2) the defendant’s use
“causes dilution of the distinctive quality of the mark.” Id. Based
on the record and authorities currently before the it, the Court concludes that
plaintiff is entitled to a TRO under this test.
The Court finds that Plaintiff’s marks are unquestionably
famous, as defendant appears to concede. In addition, the Court finds that
plaintiff has, at the very least, raised serious questions with respect to
whether defendant’s t-shirts will “dilute” these marks, as that term
is defined under 15 U.S.C. § 1127. Plaintiff has also established that the
balance of hardships tips sharply in its favor. Accordingly, under, EEOC v.
Recruit U.S.A., Inc., 939 F.2d 746, 752 (9th Cir. 1991), plaintiff is entitled
to injunctive relief.
Pending the hearing on the preliminary injunction, Andy’s,
its successors, officers, agents, employees, and anyone acting in concert with
them or at their behest, are enjoined from manufacturing, screening,
distributing, marketing, displaying, or selling the “Buttwiser”
t-shirts, or any other t-shirts or goods bearing any unauthorized designs,  [*3] slogans, labels, designations, logos,
artwork, or putative trademarks similar to Anheuser-Busch’s state and federal
registered trademarks, or the Budweiser(R) trade dress.
The Court further orders that, pending the preliminary
injunction hearing, the above designated parties shall recall and/or remove
from all locations to which they sold or distributed any and all Buttwiser
t-shirts and any other t-shirts or other goods bearing any unauthorized
designs, slogans, labels, designations, logos, artwork, or putative trademarks
similar to Anheuser-Busch’s state and federal registered trademarks, or the
Budweiser(R) trade dress, and to maintain such goods and materials until
further order from the Court.
The above TRO is effective on Plaintiff’s filing an
undertaking in the sum of $ 15,000. The Court will hold a hearing on the
preliminary injunction on Tuesday, September 10, at 3:00 p.m. Defendant’s
opposition shall be filed and served no later than September 3. Plaintiff’s
reply shall be filed and served no later than September 6.
IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED 8/28/96, THELTON E. HENDERSON, CHIEF
JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Legal Brief- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Andy’s Sportswear, Inc
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay
  
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more